qertsupport.blogg.se

Judge trying to force counsel im pro se
Judge trying to force counsel im pro se











The Supreme Court has held the right to assistance of counsel fundamental in certain juvenile proceedings as well:Ī proceeding where the issue is whether the child will be found to be delinquent and subjected to the loss of his liberty is comparable in seriousness to a felony prosecution. The present state of the law is that counsel is required in all cases where the defendant faces possible imprisonment unless the defendant properly waives his right to the assistance of counsel. This rule is in large part derived from former Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:10, and District Court Initial Rules of Criminal Procedure 2, 10 (1971). Rule 45: Removal of the disruptive defendant.Rule 39: Records of foreign proceedings and notice of foreign law.

judge trying to force counsel im pro se

Rule 35: Depositions to perpetuate testimony.Rule 33: Counsel for defendants indigent or indigent but able to contribute.

judge trying to force counsel im pro se

Rule 31: Stay of execution relief pending review automatic expiration of stay.Rule 29: Revision or revocation of disposition.Rule 25: Motion required for finding of not guilty.Rule 24: Opening statements arguments instructions to jury.Rule 11: Pretrial conference and pretrial hearing.Rule 9: Joinder of offenses or defendants.Rule 7: Initial appearance and arraignment.Rule 6: Summons to appear arrest warrant.

judge trying to force counsel im pro se

  • Rule 4: Form and contents of complaint or indictment amendment.
  • Rule 3.1: Determination of probable cause for detention.
  • Rule 3: Complaint and indictment waiver of indictment probable cause hearing.
  • Rule 2: Purpose construction definition of terms.












  • Judge trying to force counsel im pro se